昔日的類別 » 審查 «

星期一, April 20th, 2009 | 筆者:

I’m looking at the South African banking system (partly a result of watching the Zeitgeistdocumentary”) 和, after finding my bank implicated most with regards to the SA-Banking Competition Commission wikileaks scandal, I’m putting serious consideration into switching banks.

What ethical banks are out there right now? I’ve even looked into Sharia (Islamic) banking because of their strict ethics laws but even there I’m looking at even more unknowns. I’m not Islamic and I have nothing against funding pork-related activities.

On that note, do you know if your bank has a code of ethics? If they’re public, where can we see these ethics codes?

Tell me about service levels I haven’t heard of before and which bank you believe deserves to handle my money.

分享
星期三, April 15th, 2009 | 筆者:

Further to the previous post regarding Amazon, there is chatter from inside Amazon indicating that it was aglitch”. Someone in their French staff miscategorised content – 什麼 “sexualhad its “成人” bit switched on.

This would explain why social text books on sexuality and books for the disabled were affected. They’re also stating that there is in fact, no new “成人” 政策. PR screwed up royally by not having a straight answer. Was it a glitch? Was it a policy change? Are you going to change your mind tomorrow?

They’re fixing (or have probably fixed) the missing rankings. This still begs for further recourse. I think its funny how they can blame a French staffer. Maybe its a language barrier thingI can’t be sure. On a serious note, I also think its odd that there exists in the first place a feature for censorship which they have no policy for.

What say ye?

They’re still paying dearly. There are already new definitions online for Amazon rank. hehehe.

More at Science Blogs.

分享
星期一, 4月13日, 2009 | 筆者:

我堅信,每個人都有要堅持自己的理想和正確的,這些理想是神聖不可侵犯. 每個人都應該尊重這個水平,我認為擴大到包括我們不僅限於異性關係的想法. 任何人都沒有審查或小看這些思想的權利. 只是要清楚 (如果誰認為任何小雞,他們有一個鏡頭我得到的疑惑), 我把女孩. 😉

我有一些朋友女同志誰,我接受,因為它們是. 我不審判,因為他們的生活方式他們,他們根據不日期 “自然法則”. [糟糕的笑話] 嘿, 我唯一​​有時戳在他們的是,他們是不是非常有成效的社會… [/糟糕的笑話]

亞馬遜最肯定似乎並沒有被顯示,雖然他們任何方面: 在一個失敗的舉動, 亞馬遜已經實現了一個 “成人過濾” 政策. 其結果是,他們已經除去許多的搜索排名 (如果不是所有的) LGBT為主題的出版物,同時留下許多非同性戀標題不變. 職稱明確同性戀情色正確地被刪除 – 然而,一切都甚至下降到 希瑟有兩個媽媽們 被剝奪. WTF? 它的一本兒童讀物!

但, 成人玩具, 花花公子: 完整Centrefolds, 羅恩·傑里米: 最難的工作的人在演藝圈 (男性色情明星), Traci閣下: 下面這一切 (女色情明星), 完整混蛋指南處理小雞, 與其他同樣成人遊戲已經倖免.

完全噁心.

坦率地說, 即使是做這樣的執行 正確地, 他們還沒有這樣做的權利. 它應該只影響市民的搜索排名. 一旦他們已經修復了這個爛攤子, 我還是想Traci閣下在我登錄的搜索結果. 哎呦. 難道我大聲說出來? 😛

為了跟上, 去看看 耶洗別.

分享